4 ms·
what a bizarre comment. the conclusion is hardly defeatist. the TLDR of the article is that if you (for example) are struggling with focus, a strategy that is
by endisneigh 3y ago
what a bizarre comment. the conclusion is hardly defeatist.
the TLDR of the article is that if you (for example) are struggling with focus, a strategy that is basically telling yourself to focus (while loud music is playing around you) will not yield as much success as removing distractions (turning off the music) in your environment, then trying to focus again.
the efficacy of the two strategies is dependent not entirely on ones fortitude, rather ability to craft an environment that plays to the strength of will, so to speak.
- networkchad 3y ago[dead]
- kaashif 3y agoThe conclusion may not be defeatist, but the conclusion is different from the subtitle of the article (and the title of the submission): > Studies suggest that relying on will power is hopeless Which would indeed be extremely defeatist. Willpower and better strategies can both work in conjunction. Willpower is not entirely hopeless as a strategy.
- endisneigh 3y agowhy omit the last part? > Studies suggest that relying on will power is hopeless. Instead, we must find strategies that don’t require us to be strong. nothing defeatist about it. not to mention, why judge such a long article which is summarizing a long book by the subtitle which generally isn't even written by the author of the article...
- airstrike 3y agoBecause that bit is not in the title
- s1artibartfast 3y ago>Instead, we must find strategies that don’t require us to be strong. Similar to the title, is is again framing it as an either/or situation. Reality is that strategy+ willpower is the winning approach. Making change will almost always require strength, but strategy can make that requirement lower. Throwing out your cigarettes/beer/ junk food makes abstinence easier, but it doesnt make abstinence easier than buying more.
- endisneigh 3y agoAgain the article already says all of this. The issue is people judging the entire thing by the title.
- s1artibartfast 3y agothen the article is sloppy and inconsistent, because that is the opposite of what the title and conclusion said. It is like an article with starting and concluding with "bleach is safe to drink", and then discussing the dangers throughout the body. I dont think everything needs to be dumbed down - but parts of it are literally false and contradictory.
- broscillator 3y agoWillpower is effective as one component among many. Which means you're not relying on willpower alone. Much like you don't build a table with a single leg.