2 ms·
That’s not what I’m talking about, I’m saying the logic was “something like columbine will never happen because …” like ok, famous last words. Technical profici
by gnarlouse 3y ago
That’s not what I’m talking about, I’m saying the logic was “something like columbine will never happen because …” like ok, famous last words. Technical proficiency is your contribution here and I just disagree with it. It’s not like drones are (a) hard to fly, (b) expensive or (c) access restricted. Kids my age at 13 were making backshed napalm out of pure fascination.
And also I’m pretty sure the columbine kids were trying to build a bomb, so there’s your technical proficiency request.
Like I said buddy, I hope I’m wrong.
- ethbr1 3y agoDrone are indeed (a), (b), and to some degree (c), to the extent that if you're proficient with them you currently have employment opportunities in developed economies. It's the capability vs financially beneficial alternatives that matters. Links on the Columbine kids building a bomb? Given how easy it is to make a pipe bomb, I feel failure there would cut in favor of my argument re: Columbine.