> "Strong" typing often is wrongly used as a term for static typing. Minor contradiction: the distinction between strong and static typing is modern. From wiki

> "Strong" typing often is wrongly used as a term for static typing. Minor contradiction: the distinction between strong and static typing is modern. From wikipedia: > In 1974, B. Liskov and S. Zilles defined a strongly-typed language as one in which "whenever an object is passed from a calling function to a called function, its type must be compatible with the type declared in the called function."