4 ms·

If one door falls of the aircraft, it's most likely a service tech didn't do the job properly, not that there is a systematic issue. That'd require much more fa

If one door falls of the aircraft, it's most likely a service tech didn't do the job properly, not that there is a systematic issue. That'd require much more fallen doors.

ReflectedImage 3y ago
What you mean to say throwaway51104 is that it is completely Boeing's fault and you work on minimal wage in a hired PR firm trying to defend them on social media. There have been warnings for years that Boeing has lost the plot and abandoned their safety culture.
cf1241290841 3y ago
>If one door falls of the aircraft, it's most likely a service tech didn't do the job properly More or less what both Boeings predecessor and the FAA took away last time such a thing occurred. Crew didnt close the door properly and a warning sign was installed. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Airlines_Flight_96 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Airlines_Flight_96 >Injuries 11 (2 crew, 9 passengers)[1] >That'd require much more fallen doors. That happened last time that happened https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turkish_Airlines_Flight_981 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turkish_Airlines_Flight_981 >Fatalities 346 I think its fair to argue you dont have a very sensible perspective here. We tried the approach you proposed in the past and it didnt work.
- foverzar 3y ago
  > We tried the approach you proposed in the past and it didnt work. You work at Boeing or aircraft safety regulator or something? Can you elaborate on what exactly you've done?
  - cf1241290841 3y ago
    No, bad case of language barrier. Thanks for asking for clarification, its an equally unpleasant misunderstanding as people feeling insulted by the use of the generic you.
    - foverzar 3y ago
      Touché
      - cf1241290841 3y ago
        This isnt my native language, might i ask you for your interpretation of that post? I didnt think i was being confrontational here, so i cant figure out how to interpret your post. Pls be direct, any little bit helps.
adrian_b 3y ago
As many others have pointed, the aircraft was too new for that door plug to have ever been inspected by maintenance. There is no doubt that Boeing is guilty of either negligent assembly or of using wrong parts, such as inappropriate bolts. The fact that any of these two has happened indicates bad procedures used during production at Boeing. It could indicate a design problem, if for instance better bolts used in the past have been replaced with cheaper bolts.

If one door falls of the aircraft, it's most likely a service tech didn't do the job properly, not that there is a systematic issue. That'd require much more fallen doors.

ReflectedImage 3y ago

What you mean to say throwaway51104 is that it is completely Boeing's fault and you work on minimal wage in a hired PR firm trying to defend them on social media. There have been warnings for years that Boeing has lost the plot and abandoned their safety culture.

cf1241290841 3y ago

>If one door falls of the aircraft, it's most likely a service tech didn't do the job properly More or less what both Boeings predecessor and the FAA took away last time such a thing occurred. Crew didnt close the door properly and a warning sign was installed. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Airlines_Flight_96 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Airlines_Flight_96 >Injuries 11 (2 crew, 9 passengers)[1] >That'd require much more fallen doors. That happened last time that happened https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turkish_Airlines_Flight_981 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turkish_Airlines_Flight_981 >Fatalities 346 I think its fair to argue you dont have a very sensible perspective here. We tried the approach you proposed in the past and it didnt work.

foverzar 3y ago
> We tried the approach you proposed in the past and it didnt work. You work at Boeing or aircraft safety regulator or something? Can you elaborate on what exactly you've done?
- cf1241290841 3y ago
  No, bad case of language barrier. Thanks for asking for clarification, its an equally unpleasant misunderstanding as people feeling insulted by the use of the generic you.
  - foverzar 3y ago
    Touché
    - cf1241290841 3y ago
      This isnt my native language, might i ask you for your interpretation of that post? I didnt think i was being confrontational here, so i cant figure out how to interpret your post. Pls be direct, any little bit helps.

adrian_b 3y ago

As many others have pointed, the aircraft was too new for that door plug to have ever been inspected by maintenance. There is no doubt that Boeing is guilty of either negligent assembly or of using wrong parts, such as inappropriate bolts. The fact that any of these two has happened indicates bad procedures used during production at Boeing. It could indicate a design problem, if for instance better bolts used in the past have been replaced with cheaper bolts.