3 ms·
You just ignored all of my questions and are now insinuating that I said something implying that I am "sticking to third party tracking cookies". In case you d
by Sephr 3y ago
You just ignored all of my questions and are now insinuating that I said something implying that I am "sticking to third party tracking cookies".
In case you didn't get the drift from "Advertisers don't have an intrinsic right to optimally profit off my device hardware": I block third party cookies in Chrome and use other browsers that have third-party cookies blocked by default.
If you're asking about how I use third party cookies myself in my own software: I maintain a popular consent manager used all across the internet. It doesn't use third-party cookies. We're actually planning to implement Privacy Sandbox regulation capabilities so that our customers can properly gate your APIs based on tracking consent and user privacy rights (since you don't respect your own browser privacy signals).
If you're asking how I will react to a web with more paywalled ad-free content: Emotions ranging from indifferent to pleased, depending on the content source.
Are you aware that your coworkers have frequently claimed that Privacy Sandbox by itself somehow "enhances" ad privacy, conflating the removal of third party cookies with the introduction of Privacy Sandbox? The notice has since been removed, but I'm still waiting (likely forever) for an issue to be addressed about these fraudulent claims[1].
Nobody wants Privacy Sandbox except advertisers.
1. https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1431547 https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=143154...
- choppaface 3y agoNo no, this is a Googler defending the superiority of Google’s new cookie design. You’re supposed to assume your questions were too dumb and Google has everything figured out.