3 ms·
Boeing is playing off its role as being so vital to national security that the government will keep it from suffering too much loss. Fair enough. However, if
by RcouF1uZ4gsC 3y ago
Boeing is playing off its role as being so vital to national security that the government will keep it from suffering too much loss.
Fair enough.
However, if that is the case, then the bean counting management is guilty of sabotaging US national security by running Boeing into the ground for short term profits.
The entire C-Suite of Boeing should be sentenced to multi-decade prison terms at IDF SuperMax for their selling out US National security for profit.
- ametrau 3y ago> The entire C-Suite of Boeing should be sentenced to multi-decade prison terms at IDF SuperMax for their selling out US National security for profit. 100%
- philwelch 3y ago> Boeing is playing off its role as being so vital to national security that the government will keep it from suffering too much loss. I don’t actually think this is true. Boeing has a terrible track record with defense contracts in recent years. They lost the KC-X tanker competition to Airbus before Boeing lobbied to overturn the decision, they lost the JSF competition to the Lockheed Martin F-35, and they (in partnership with Sikorsky) lost the Black Hawk replacement competition to Bell. Super Hornet production is ending next year and Osprey production could probably be turned over to Bell. No, it’s less that Boeing is vital to national security and more that Boeing is a government jobs program. It’s the jobs—not Boeing’s importance to national security—that has influenced powerful senators like Patty Murray and Lindsay Graham to put their thumbs on the scale.