4 ms·
Where do you get this from?
by keleftheriou 3y ago
Where do you get this from?
- lawgimenez 3y ago> Apple rejected our stand-alone free companion app “because it doesn’t do anything”. It says on DHH’s blog. We can’t know for sure unless he shares a screenshot of it but more or less that is the reason because I was rejected with this same reason before.
- ricardobeat 3y agoProviding credentials for a test account is mandatory, and as a company publishing multiple apps it’s not something they would miss.
- angulardragon03 3y agoIt feels to me that, if you were going to make the complaint that DHH has, you would also explicitly mention that you had given them test account credentials. The actual reasonable complaint would be to say "we gave them test account credentials and they _still_ said our app was non-functional". But, that isn't the messaging here, it's not even mentioned. Given that DHH has very public opinions about Apple, I find it hard to believe he would miss the opportunity to make such a slam dunk, unless it wasn't true to make that claim.
- ricardobeat 3y agoSo you think they intentionally not provided credentials, ruining their own release plans, yet somehow Apple took 19 days to realize and reply? The internet is funny…
- lawgimenez 3y agoSome Apple reviewers will take into account existing data too. Not just being able to sign in. So the provided credentials should have enough data.
- cachehit 3y agoThis is a quote from DHH from LinkedIn: >Of course we gave them a login. We’ve been publishing apps on the App Store for over a decade. This was not a low-level mistake. It went all the way to the app review board. In another response he writes that the reviewers did in fact log in.