9 ms·
it was always the "Right approach" and everyone knew that there was nothing in the laws of physics that prohibits this. But you are writing that as if it's stil
by SCM-Enthusiast 3y ago
it was always the "Right approach" and everyone knew that there was nothing in the laws of physics that prohibits this. But you are writing that as if it's still be solved.
No one has ever had a fully reusable orbital rocket.. still to this day. Althought starships got a shot.
- tsimionescu 3y agoIt should be noted that reusable rockets are fundamentally less cargo per trip than non-reusable ones, since the reusable rockets have to carry extra fuel for re-entry. The sweetspot of having enough mass to orbit so that this reduced capacity is still worth it is not at all easy to reach. In general, if rocket building costs could really be reduced to almost nothing, reusable rockets would be useless. The only case where reusable rockets have a chance is if building rockets is still very expensive.
- Qwertious 3y agoEven if building rockets can be cheap, not all rockets/use-cases can be solved cheaply.
- SCM-Enthusiast 3y agoor if you can reduce the total cost of the payload. That's what blue orgin is doing with the blue ring concept. Take avionics, data telemetry, battery's, and solar panels out of the design and let the customer focus on what end goal they are trying to achieve. I think blue ring is a very good business innovation as well.