3 ms·
> He was/is correct about many things, but not about the afterlife. What method did you use to objectively determine whether there is an afterlife, in a manner
by mistermann 3y ago
> He was/is correct about many things, but not about the afterlife.
What method did you use to objectively determine whether there is an afterlife, in a manner that is impossible to be incorrect?
> And if you have been told all your life that is reality and you 'saw' it, why question it?
You arrived at this extremely popular yet epistemically unsound "fact" entirely independently did you?
- anonzzzies 3y ago> entirely independently did you? And you? Your past comments show you are religious and as such there is no point of replying with much else than this.
- mistermann 3y ago> And you? And me what? > Your past comments show... Do you play any role in this "showing" phenomenon, human not at all prone to cognitive error? > ...you are religious... Indeed I am - have you any interest in which religion I practice/ Because it matters. > ...and as such there is no point of replying with much else than this. Do you present (or even better: perceive) this as an opinion, or as a fact? If a fact: from what source do you derive your omniscient knowledge of What Is?