25 ms·
> You seem to be a person of faith, there's no arguing with people of faith. Can you describe the methodology you used to determine that this is necessarily tr
by mistermann 3y ago
> You seem to be a person of faith, there's no arguing with people of faith.
Can you describe the methodology you used to determine that this is necessarily true, with zero exceptions?
> I just understand the limits of what we can actually know...
Ah, a perfectly rational human....this is like the 50th or so I've encountered this week!
Careful...faith is fundamental to human consciousness, and cultures, it comes in a wide variety of forms, and those who suffer from it typically are rendered unable to self-diagnose.
- fsckboy 3y agomy apologies, you came in late, i'm on the other side (your side) of this debate, I was debating a rationalist, using the subterfuge of pointing out the religion that is materialism. some material that was getting downvoted was removed
- mistermann 3y agoAh ok....humans are interesting eh? So much potential, but so determined to fail. edit: wait a minute....wtf am I quoting from here? None of what I quoted now exists, yet there's no edit indicator on your comment....hmmmmm.