> So it's weaponized sometimes but it isn't? This is either "what is the definition of is" or cleaning up with PR what Elon directed at the time. One can be co

> So it's weaponized sometimes but it isn't? This is either "what is the definition of is" or cleaning up with PR what Elon directed at the time. One can be comfortable with weaponization by their own country of things that are specifically sold to the military for military use, and be uncomfortable with a foreign country weaponizing things that were sold for civilian use. What is wrong with wanting to leave that decision to their own countries' political and military leadership? > It is not good when a congressional committee rep uses the words “serious national security liability issues" to describe your actions This is way overblown, members of congress say things all the times for PR purposes that amount to nothing in the long run, for example the recent iMessage blocking by Apple, four members called it out, and yet Apple just ignored them.