4 ms·
The idea that reading a piece of text constitutes copyright infringement is ridiculous. Copyright isn’t some infectious thing. Reading copyrighted text doesn’t
by valine 3y ago
The idea that reading a piece of text constitutes copyright infringement is ridiculous. Copyright isn’t some infectious thing. Reading copyrighted text doesn’t give the copyright holder a claim to the future creative work of the reader.
You want to restrict model training, I get it. The debate is still ongoing, but I’m confident when these “copyright” claims work their way through court the AI companies will come out on top.
- krainboltgreene 3y ago> The idea that reading a piece of text constitutes copyright infringement is ridiculous. No man, it's not ridiculous. If I write a program that copies someone's book and try to sell it I'm infringing on that copyright. I cannot sell a zipped version of the Harry Potter books. I feel like there's so many people weighing in on this discussion who haven't actually done any real world copyright related stuff.
- valine 3y agoI see the source of your confusion. LLMs are not actually zips of the training dataset.
- krainboltgreene 3y agoIt is an incredibly common refrain amongst experts in the field that it is a compression of the dataset. But that doesn't matter, because you clearly didn't understand what I was writing which doesn't shock me considering your position on LLMs.
- valine 3y ago> It is an incredibly common refrain amongst experts in the field that it is a compression of the dataset This was a common idea three years ago. No one in the field seriously believes this today.
- krainboltgreene 3y agoYou're going to have to let a lot of scientists know that, because they're still publishing papers with that understanding. I guess they should have consulted you first.
- valine 3y agoNot their fault, hindsight is 20/20.