Aren't there two completely separate use cases? 1. Syncing files across different computers: think git for docs. 2. Backing up files: no versioning necessary

Aren't there two completely separate use cases? 1. Syncing files across different computers: think git for docs. 2. Backing up files: no versioning necessary Price points for these should be different imo. I'd live with a backup that offers little redundancy cause there is a small chance that my backup and my laptop die at the same time. S3 & Dropbox are expensive in large part due to that redundancy. I only use Dropbox for syncing a small set of docs and live with the free account just fine. I should probably use online backup at some point but I just don't feel like the S3 solution is appropriate for this. I dont need my photos or music stored in 3 different data centers across the globe, and I don't want it to sync to all my computers either.