I don't get Ubuntu, or the comments sometimes. > Some people do, as Snap supports some functionality that the Flatpak alternative does not (in particular, serv

I don't get Ubuntu, or the comments sometimes. > Some people do, as Snap supports some functionality that the Flatpak alternative does not (in particular, server applications). That's called Docker and Kubernetes. I have no idea who, out there, would be stupid enough to trust a production server deployment on Snap. The very idea is horrifying. If something goes wrong, at all, you're probably SOL unless you pay Canonical a pretty penny for your as-good-as-proprietary setup. In which case, if the server market has a far-and-away better solution, what markets are left for Snap? Desktop and IoT. In that case, make Snap exclusively IoT and concede desktop to Flatpak and we all go home happy.