3 ms·
It's true though. The FDA almost certainly has at least a dozen folks much smarter than the user calling them 'clueless'. And all regulated organizations, in
by MichaelZuo 3y ago
It's true though.
The FDA almost certainly has at least a dozen folks much smarter than the user calling them 'clueless'.
And all regulated organizations, in total, certainly have many hundreds much smarter responding to the FDA.
It's very likely that at least a few thousand actual bonafide geniuses interact substantially, in some way, in any given year.
- chiefalchemist 3y agoSmart? What does that have to do with doing their job? Are you saying that smart people aren't lazy? Aren't corruptible? Don't suffer from group-think? Geez, the list could go on and on and on. If smart was all that is necessary, we wouldn't need the likes of the FDA. If smart was all that is necessary, the world wouldn't be the clusterfuck that it is. History is clear...relying on smart is a stupid idea. Ignoring history? Even worse.
- MichaelZuo 3y agoThese points would also apply to HN users, so the relative gap remains the same.