4 ms·
(this is probably unfairly cynical but), reading heavily between the lines, this reads to me like DHH noticed lots of Rails folks and rubyists already like and
by maxsilver 3y ago
(this is probably unfairly cynical but), reading heavily between the lines, this reads to me like DHH noticed lots of Rails folks and rubyists already like and use "standardrb" for this https://github.com/standardrb/standard https://github.com/standardrb/standard -- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QVilOzkLdlI https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QVilOzkLdlI -- but for some (unspecified?) reason(s), wasn't willing to bless the popular community-created universal standard as default convention, so instead wrote up his own, and is declaring his the default convention for Rails.
- kevinmchugh 3y agoThis doesn't seem unfair to me at all.
- jkmcf 3y agoI don’t get the impression that standardrb is that popular. It’s also hyper strict, which is ok for a new project, but won’t play nicely with any legacy app. Though I’m surprised DHH didn’t write his own RuboCop from scratch.