3 ms·
You can’t have the rule of law without an independent judiciary. For me, I would rather have a jury of my peers and the protections of the Federal Rules of Evi
by granzymes 3y ago
You can’t have the rule of law without an independent judiciary.
For me, I would rather have a jury of my peers and the protections of the Federal Rules of Evidence than go before a kangaroo agency court where my prosecutor was chosen by the same people who will ultimately decide my case (and in some agencies they also chose to bring the case in the first place; talk about prejudging the issue).
- solardev 3y agoI'm all for specialized courts following the rule of law, and juries of your peers. The supreme court is not independent. They are politically appointed, politically not appointed, accountable to no citizen, and very much a kangaroo court. At this point they're just party line puppets, empowering their benefactors with no actual regard to any philosophy like originalism or precedence. It'd be funny if it wasn't so sad how brazenly corrupt they are. That whole thing needs a redo.
- granzymes 3y agoI wish you luck in reforming the Supreme Court. I just don’t think it has anything to do with the much more tractable issue of administrative courts.