4 ms·
If you can't justify the cost of RHEL for your use case, I believe Fedora would be the best alternative at this time since its development has not been affected
by jasoneckert 3y ago
If you can't justify the cost of RHEL for your use case, I believe Fedora would be the best alternative at this time since its development has not been affected by the changes recently made to CentOS, and it provides a near identical feature set.
- orev 3y agoFedora is a moving target that changes every 6 months. That’s not suitable for an enterprise application.
- yjftsjthsd-h 3y ago> and it provides a near identical feature set. The leading features of CentOS were 1. Absurdly stable; keep updating the same version in place for a decade without changing it. 2. Drop-in compatible with proprietary drivers and applications published for RHEL. Fedora is not a replacement for CentOS.
- dralley 3y agoThere is no planet on which Fedora makes more sense than CentOS Stream as a CentOS replacement.
- ktm5j 3y agoI love fedora, it's been my daily driver for a long time.. but it's not designed to be stable. Things break. Usually nothing you can't work past, but you don't want to spend that kind of effort to maintain stable servers.