3 ms·
I think you made a typo, "at most as secure" should be "at least as secure" :) But you're right, the important takeaway here is that encrypting with a weak and
by n2d4 3y ago
I think you made a typo, "at most as secure" should be "at least as secure" :)
But you're right, the important takeaway here is that encrypting with a weak and a strong cipher sequentially may be less secure than just using the strong cipher. For those to which this seems counterintuitive, here is the paper that shows this result: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF02620231 https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF02620231
- magicalhippo 3y agoWould be a fun plot twist in a Bond-like movie. Baddies have used multiple encryption algorithms like an onion, which due to this issue can be broken rather easily by the good guys. "Good thing they didn't know about this issue and put the weak cipher first..."
- SAI_Peregrinus 3y agoCorrect, should have been "at least".