3 ms·
You're just parroting the Google lawyers' line here. Your argument contains no evidence to contradict the assertion that Google and Cognizant are joint employe
by stonogo 3y ago
You're just parroting the Google lawyers' line here. Your argument contains no evidence to contradict the assertion that Google and Cognizant are joint employers here (as Google and Accenture were found to be last time we went around this carousel) and since the judicial authority over this matter has ruled that they are, the ball is very much in the "no they're not" court to prove it.
- Alupis 3y agoThe Accenture case is still being litigated. It's even in the article.. none of this is settled, and likely will not be for years if ever. > judicial authority over this matter has ruled that they are NLRB has no authority to classify contractors as employees. That's why this is still being litigated. > You're just parroting the Google lawyers' line here. Stating reality and facts does not make one a "parrot" as you claim.
- stonogo 3y agoThe fact that it's being appealed doesn't negate the existence of a prior ruling, and your act of parroting does not make you a parrot. Finally, yes, the NLRB has exactly that authority, including determining the standard to be used to make the distinction, no matter how many times you baselessly and falsely claim otherwise. Your confidence in facts and reality is commendable, but your grasp of those terms may not be as strong as you assume.