4 ms·
No doubt it starts as an open question and slowly moves towards knowing. Which isn't really much of a conflict. You can prove out your thoughts in a scripting
by randomdata 3y ago
No doubt it starts as an open question and slowly moves towards knowing.
Which isn't really much of a conflict. You can prove out your thoughts in a scripting language, and after the dust has settled you can move the workload to a systems language. Different jobs, different tools.
I guess if you're one of those weird religious types that insist there is only one true God (read: programming language) you might feel conflict, but nobody else cares.
- galaxyLogic 3y ago> Different jobs, different tools And possibly different programmers. Say your a (non-computer-) scientist. It is not (typically) part of your job to learn Rust or Haskell. You might want to learn Rust if you are so inclined but many scientists are not.
- randomdata 3y agoI'm sure there are exceptions, but generally speaking, do scientists ever really end up working on systems? Anecdotally, I work with a lot of scientists and they only write scripts. When systems are needed, they hand it off to the development team. Anyone can fumble through scripting, but there is a lot more to think about when building systems, and that's probably not something most scientists want to put effort into – for the same reasons they probably don't want to learn Rust. Realistically, learning Rust is the easiest part of becoming a systems programmer. But there is little incentive to learn any system language if your workload is always scripting in nature. You are going to, rightfully, reach for a scripting language.