3 ms·
Would it make sense to run a bridge for Asterisk to call into? Most WebRTC services will have proprietary signaling, so you will have to write some signaling co
by Sean-Der 3y ago
Would it make sense to run a bridge for Asterisk to call into? Most WebRTC services will have proprietary signaling, so you will have to write some signaling code.
```
Asterisk -> Bridge -> WebRTC Service
```
You could do it all in Asterisk you will just have to write a fair amount of C code! It's been years since I have done that though. Reach out on https://pion.ly/slack https://pion.ly/slack and would love to help :)
- mc_ 3y agoI know FreeSWITCH and Kamailio both have WebRTC connections available, so if you use a SIP client in the browser over WebRTC to the server, you can plug into telephony networks on the server side. We use Kamailio's WebRTC implementation heavily in Kazoo along with our libwebphone client. The transport is abstracted so Kazoo deals with the device and its configs; the Kamailio instance the browser connects to does the TLS termination for WebRTC. FreeSWITCH has the smarts for the SDP DTLS bits. And it all just works real nice together.