3 ms·
The only thing I can think of is for individuals who have credible threats against them. It could be easy enough to delay the relay of that information to the g
by giantg2 3y ago
The only thing I can think of is for individuals who have credible threats against them. It could be easy enough to delay the relay of that information to the general public by 24hrs or something so that the data is available but poses less use to potential threat actors.
- stavros 3y agoHow are you going to delay the relay when anyone with a receiver can just receive and relay the data?
- mschuster91 3y agoHammer down on the aggregators, nothing easier than that.
- stavros 3y agoIs it as easy as shutting down piracy sites?
- giantg2 3y agoProbably not with the current tech, but there are lots of ways to do it. You don't need to delay the signal, only the information tied to that signal. If you get away from static identifiers and use something like a rotating RSA key, then the data associated with that key could be released at a later time. Not ideal for transparency unless there's a strict retention/audit process for the gold copy (perhaps one of the few legit use cases for immutable block chain since all identifies should be unique too).