3 ms·
>Wait, so just because there's fuzziness to the data you're going to instead defer to what? I'm constantly amazed at how people are willing to throw away data
by itsoktocry 3y ago
>Wait, so just because there's fuzziness to the data you're going to instead defer to what?
I'm constantly amazed at how people are willing to throw away data if it's not perfect. All you need is a bit of signal, and it's, literally, better than nothing.
- riversflow 3y agoNo, it's not better than nothing. Having played out the exact situation you are describing, If you have some data, but it has no firm causal link between your input and your output, it is simply a distraction and a waste of time and effort to utilize it. You are better off experimenting purely randomly or based on first principles in that case.