4 ms·
It's not better than proper research, but when proper research doesn't exist it's all we have
by ChadNauseam 3y ago
It's not better than proper research, but when proper research doesn't exist it's all we have
- josephg 3y agoYour “gut” instincts can also be a remarkably effective tool in the right situations. You have to feed it enough data and are careful of systematic biases, but your instincts can be brilliant. I had an incredible moment in a job interview: for context, I’ve been programming for about 30 years and 10 of those years have involved a lot of JavaScript. I was given a timed debugging problem to test my skills: “Here is some JS code with failing tests. Go fix the bugs.” Before I even ran the tests I scrolled through the code to get a sense of it. My instincts tweaked on one section. “This code smells. I don’t trust it.” I said. On second glance - “Oh yeah this is totally buggy”. Sure enough, I was right. The interviewer was blown away. There’s no way I could do that consciously. Science is great for a lot of things, but when we don’t have science, we could do a lot worse than trusting our intuition.