4 ms·
Only responding to clarify: the only part I will admit was incorrect was the quote, "and, by extension, his consulting and training enterprises." Everything el
by bcrescimanno 15y ago
Only responding to clarify: the only part I will admit was incorrect was the quote, "and, by extension, his consulting and training enterprises." Everything else I said I stand by 100%. Maybe I'm wrong and that's not his intent--but it's certainly the perception I have; having watched this same scene play out time and again.
- ahoyhere 14y agoYour whole argument about him doing this for promotional purposes hinges on the idea that he gets something out of it (e.g. sales). You have no real reason to believe that he takes a "contrarian" position to "get a rise out of others," other than your implication that he gains by "marketing opportunities." In fact, your whole argument was a subtle way of saying "He doesn't really believe this, he's just peddling shit in order to make sales." None of which you can support, especially since the implied gain (the sales) doesn't exist. You have no real reason to believe, much less state publicly, that Thomas is disingenuous in his opinions. This makes it an ad hominem attack, by the by.