https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Holocaust https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Holocaust https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Khmer_Rouge https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Holocaust https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Holocaust https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Khmer_Rouge https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Khmer_Rouge https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spanish_Inquisition https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spanish_Inquisition https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Purge https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Purge https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Brown_(abolitionist) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Brown_(abolitionist) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iranian_Revolution https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iranian_Revolution > but there are practical matters You're arguing as if I said this is a good solution. It's not. > but then you're up against an enemy that is well armed. How are you going to get your hands on jets, tanks and nukes? How did the Taliban succeed? How did the Viet Cong succeed? > the danger of actually being one of those people you mention Lol. I don't think my views being willfully misrepresented by a stranger on the Internet is "dangerous."