3 ms·
It happened at least twice. The first time, it gave jQuery, which notably inherited the $ and the terser syntax from perl. The second time, indeed, JS found Pe
by jraph 3y ago
It happened at least twice.
The first time, it gave jQuery, which notably inherited the $ and the terser syntax from perl. The second time, indeed, JS found Perl's "use strict" quite cute.
- gorkish 3y agoI disagree that jquery adopted anything from perl. jQuery's $ is not a sigil.
- lifthrasiir 3y agoIt was originally `use strict` without any quotes, along with other possible `use ...` statements in the scrapped ES4 working draft. It seems that the exact person suggested this particular syntax was David-Sarah Hopwood [1], which suggestion was quickly adopted to the next draft of what eventually became ES5. [1] https://web.archive.org/web/20150525070848/https://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es5-discuss/2009-May/002591.html https://web.archive.org/web/20150525070848/https://mail.mozi...
- jraph 3y agoIt was good that it's a string literal, so it did not make the file incompatible with parsers that didn't support strict mode. You'd have to make sure your code behaved correctly both in sloppy mode and in strict mode. Probably irrelevant today.
- lifthrasiir 3y agoThat indeed was a big concern, and the initial proposal assumed that it at least has to survive the lexical analysis. At some point there were two syntaxes, `use strict` (optionally followed by a comma and other tokens) or `if (false) use(strict)` at one's choice. In comparison Hopwood's proposal was not even an actual proposal but quickly adopted due to its simplicity and robustness. The only complaint was a space in the literal.