3 ms·
I'm not one of these guys, but what I imagine is that it's purely ego-driven. They just see themselves as too important to die in squalor with the rest of the m
by troyvit 3y ago
I'm not one of these guys, but what I imagine is that it's purely ego-driven. They just see themselves as too important to die in squalor with the rest of the masses. When "the end" comes their estate would be too vulnerable compared to a protected bunker.
The one in the article will apparently include 30 offices, so I imagine he'll make sure social media will emerge from the other side of the apocalypse, so expect lots of selfies with people holding their enemy's head and howling at the moon?
The last thing is I bet these guys at least feel connected enough to get more advance warning than the normals.
- toomuchtodo 3y agoCan you imagine trying to hold stand ups and drive product in a post apocalyptic world at what's left of Meta? Tremendous. "Netflix! You're green lit!" The parody writes itself.
- s1artibartfast 3y ago>I'm not one of these guys, but what I imagine is that it's purely ego-driven. They just see themselves as too important to die in squalor with the rest of the masses. I struggle to understand where you are coming from. Do you want to die in squaller with the rest of the masses? If you are in a tower on fire, do you not want to leave and survive?
- troyvit 3y agoI see where you're coming from. To me we all _are_ figuratively in a tower on fire. The fire's just started, but nobody's doing much about it. As one of the masses I try to do my part in my personal and professional life. The oligarchs and plutocrats might have the collective power to put out that fire, but they'd rather take a fire escape. I say that, but I bet they donate more to different causes than I'll see in a lifetime. So -- who am I to fault them for hedging their bets right?