4 ms·
Why spend all this money to build bunkers in likely the first places to be fully underwater when global catastrophes/climate shit goes down? Lol. I'd build mine
by jkea 3y ago
Why spend all this money to build bunkers in likely the first places to be fully underwater when global catastrophes/climate shit goes down? Lol. I'd build mine in the middle of Wyoming or something.
- hn_throwaway_99 3y agoYou realize Hawaii is made up of mountains, correct?
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- jl6 3y agoDepending on what the threat is, underwater could offer an additional layer of protection?
- neilk 3y agoPlot twist: the Hawaii bunker is just the decoy bunker
- Zambyte 3y ago> all this money All what money? Scaled for a net worth of 100k, this would cost less than $200.
- the_third_wave 3y agoIn general it is better to act as those who tell you things are going to be a certain way do, not as they say. That means it is unlikely for e.g. Martha's Vineyard to end up fully underwater when global catastrophes/climate shit goes down given the fact that the Obamas moved there to a property which lies about 4 metres (13 ft.) above the high tide line. With an average sea level rise of 3 mm/year it will take a while for the island to be flooded.