3 ms·
Legal theories work entirely differently than technical strategies. Lawyers can spin this failure into political ammunition the next time SOPA or TPP (remember
by gosub100 3y ago
Legal theories work entirely differently than technical strategies. Lawyers can spin this failure into political ammunition the next time SOPA or TPP (remember that one?) comes up: "we tried to use the existing laws to seize DNS records, but dontcha-know, they immediately circumvented it because not all DNS authorities work together. That alone could have prevented $X00 million in losses. Thats why we need a new law to ____, and ____, and stop ____. and we need all countries on board with this binding trade agreement."
- sjfjsjdjwvwvc 3y agoI'm not saying the futility of their efforts is the reason to change copyright law (although it should be possible to turn the argument your imagined lawyer comes up with around) - I’m saying what they are doing is futile, hurts more or less all of humanity AND copyright law is broken and does not serve its intended purpose anymore.
- gosub100 3y agoIt sounds like we both agree the countermeasures were futile. I guess my comment can be refactored to "The Law allows you a play-the-victim card, which you can't do in tech". I would reform your statement to "copyright doesn't serve its original intended purpose", but serves its de facto purpose just fine: keeping corporations raking in profits. they dont need to stop all countermeasures to accessing Anna, or whatever avenue pirates use. They just need to keep netflix and all other big name content providers/broadcasters/record labels paying their royalties (at the expense of artists and support staff) for as many decades as possible. If you look at it that way, copyright is working fine.