5 ms·
Agreed. A 40W 1550nm laser I used in grad school would burn post it notes readily and slowly burn black painted objects. It gave me a little burn once too (Was
by rubidium 3y ago
Agreed. A 40W 1550nm laser I used in grad school would burn post it notes readily and slowly burn black painted objects. It gave me a little burn once too (Was like touching a hot stove). 1.5W focused to 100 um would be a zinger, but at 4 mm would be not super dangerous thermally.
The main risk is you couldn’t see it so no blink reflex to help from even specular reflections.
Regardless, it would be reckless to expose this to people without eye protection.
- weberer 3y agoI think your laser was 40mW. A 40W laser can engrave steel.
- NietzscheanNull 3y agoJudging by the fact that they mentioned being in grad school at the time and that the laser was infrared, I imagine engraving steel isn't too far off from what they were using it for.
- BenjiWiebe 3y agoBut they mentioned it would slowly burn black painted objects.
- gorlilla 3y agoIt's all about absorption spectrum. 40W at 10600nm will burn clean through a few mm of wood but could only maybe lightly etch brass and be utterly useless on aluminum. 40W of energy is being delivered, what happens to the thing it's being delivered to is entirely dependent on absorptive potential.
- xxs 3y agoAgree on the 3 orders of magnitude difference. 40W soldering iron will inflate post-it notes, 40W laser steel/stone engraving/cutting area.
- cycomanic 3y agoDepends highly on wavelength and pulse length. IIRC the vast majority of laser engraving lasers are pulsed (the cheaper ones are probably qswitched) so 40W actually gives you peak powers much higher than 40W. Igniting something is actually quite different from cutting or engraving. Lasers are often so good at cutting because they don't deliver enough energy to set things on fire, but enough inatantaneous intensity to rip molecules apart (have a look at comparisons between femtosecond and nanosecond laser cutting for example).
- rubidium 3y agoBeg your pardon, but I think I would know (PhD in experimental AMO physics). It was one of these: https://www.ipgphotonics.com/en/products/lasers/low-power-cw-fiber-lasers/1-53-1-65-micron/elm-and-elr-1-100-w https://www.ipgphotonics.com/en/products/lasers/low-power-cw...
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- avsteele 3y agoGuy's name is literally rubidium!
- galangalalgol 3y agoCould a fiber break in the wall ignite the sheath? What if the Sheath broke as well and it is up against the cardboard backing of drywall? Worst case, cellulose insulation?
- cycomanic 3y agoCellulose insulation is in fact very flame retardent. But to your question yes if the broken fibre was stuck against something flammable it could slowly ignite it.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]