3 ms·
They had a great website and UX. Would love to know why this change. A few years ago we were very worried about the seemingly large number of dev tooling VC fu
by RyanHamilton 3y ago
They had a great website and UX. Would love to know why this change.
A few years ago we were very worried about the seemingly large number of dev tooling VC funded startups. It's hard to beat someone that doesn't need to turn a profit. But just focussing on our niche and improving our products each day has worked.
We make a low-code offering that allows creating interactive applications. We are much less of a generic tool, more specialized towards "real-time" and often finance based apps. If that sounds useful to you please checkout PulseUI: https://www.timestored.com/pulse/ https://www.timestored.com/pulse/
My business partner and I bootstrapped the company 12+ years ago and have been profitably supplying data tooling for years. We've often signed escrow with larger companies to avoid this kind of bus-factor problem and are now going open source: https://github.com/timestored/pulseui https://github.com/timestored/pulseui Given our first product was started over a decade ago it's a journey to get there.