5 ms·
From my perspective, your example of a yearly month-long vacation to a personal vacation home is unthinkably extravagent, and anyone in that situation is rich e
by lukas099 3y ago
From my perspective, your example of a yearly month-long vacation to a personal vacation home is unthinkably extravagent, and anyone in that situation is rich enough not to worry about the inefficiencies I am talking about (from a personal finance POV I mean. From an environmental standpoint it is an abomination)
- mort96 3y agoWhat part of it is "unthinkably extravagant"? Having a vacation home isn't very uncommon, 4 weeks of vacation in a year isn't uncommon. You don't need to be stupidly rich to be in the situation I described, you just need to 1) have had enough spare money or luck ant some point to end up with a vacation home (inherited or otherwise), 2) not have severe enough financial trouble in the present to sell it, and 3) value it enough to prioritize it over the benefits of selling it.
- fnimick 3y agoHaving a vacation home is incredibly uncommon and privileged compared to a huge population that can't even afford a primary home that they own.
- mort96 3y agoI'm in Norway, so that probably skews my perception a bit. I'd say it's almost more common than not to have some vacation home in the family, and 4 weeks of paid holiday is the legally mandated minimum.
- JohnFen 3y agoSame with having four weeks of vacation every year, at least in the US.