4 ms·
> Which part of the open letter discusses working conditions? The sections regarding unacceptable behavior seem like potential candidates: > SpaceX’s current
by aw1621107 3y ago
> Which part of the open letter discusses working conditions?
The sections regarding unacceptable behavior seem like potential candidates:
> SpaceX’s current systems and culture do not live up to its stated values, as many employees continue to experience unequal enforcement of our oft-repeated “No Asshole” and “Zero Tolerance” policies. This must change.
> [snip]
> Define and uniformly respond to all forms of unacceptable behavior. Clearly define what exactly is intended by SpaceX’s “no-asshole” and “zero tolerance” policies and enforce them consistently. SpaceX must establish safe avenues for reporting and uphold clear repercussions for all unacceptable behavior, whether from the CEO or an employee starting their first day.
- leereeves 3y agoSo that raises an interesting question. If part of the letter was about working conditions, and part was about Elon tweeting, can they legally be fired for the second part of the open letter despite the existence of the first?
- water-data-dude 3y agoThis is my reading and might be off base, but it seems like they’re saying that Elon is undermining the “no assholes” and “zero tolerance” policies with his very loud and visible opinions. As long as Elon is seen as BEING SpaceX, his dismissive attitude towards things like sexual harassment will make it difficult to enforce policies against that sort of behavior. That’s why they asked SpaceX to distance itself from Twitter Elon.
- leereeves 3y agoDo those “no assholes” and “zero tolerance” policies apply to employee behavior outside work?
- wahnfrieden 3y agodoes a ceo or worker represent their company when making public statements on media platforms?
- leereeves 3y agoLegally? I don't believe so but I'm not a lawyer. What's your opinion? Do you allow ceos to have private lives?