I just don't want legislation telling competent people what to do here. I want the legislation to be more analogous to child protective services. I feel that a

I just don't want legislation telling competent people what to do here. I want the legislation to be more analogous to child protective services. I feel that a guardian should have a choice up until they are negligent or inhibiting (however a society deems it - specifically left as this definition). If said guardian is able to raise a kid in a healthy environment, with a healthy relationship to technology, then I do not want to step on their toes. I think we need to 'reverse Chesterton's fence'(?) our liberty here, let's not lose our freedom and build a restrictive fence or Berlin wall. I know many people disagree with me, but the fact that there isn't consensus here means we should tread carefully lest break some cotton mills.