4 ms·
Don't integrate early-stage SaaS as critical to your business is the main lesson here. You get laid-off just like their employees when they rush toward a shitty
by hipadev23 3y ago
Don't integrate early-stage SaaS as critical to your business is the main lesson here. You get laid-off just like their employees when they rush toward a shitty acquisition.
- macspoofing 3y ago>Don't integrate early-stage SaaS as critical to your business is the main lesson here. Let's be honest, nobody had 'Airplane' as some critical part of their business.
- vbhakta 3y agoWe use it for customer support
- sokoloff 3y agoYou might be surprised how many shadow IT projects end up becoming load-bearing members in businesses. (I think this is mostly a good thing, because it works out a lot more often than it fails, but when it fails like this, it can be very disruptive.)
- swyx 3y agoif everyone was as blanket-critical of early stage SaaS as you we would get a lot less innovation (or at least challengers to keep incumbents honest). someone needs to be discerning of team/product quality, someone needs to take risks to solve pain for their stakeholders. there are good startups that are good partners, there are startups that give a good try and dont make it, and there are plain bad startups. don't throw everyone under the bus
- Johnny555 3y agoMy company had a significant product based on an early stage startup's product -- before we signed a license with them, we negotiated a code escrow agreement with the company. And it was good that we did because about a year later they got acquired by a company that didn't want to continue selling the product we used, but we got the source code so were able to maintain the product. We picked up a couple of the developers that were working on that product too.
- Redoubts 3y ago> we negotiated a code escrow agreement with the company. really curious of the terms of that
- Johnny555 3y agoMe too, only a few people in the company knew the terms of the agreement, apparently it was the only code escrow agreement that company made and it was protected under NDA. I don't think we paid a premium for it, but signed a longer term licensing agreement.
- swyx 3y agowoudl love to learn more - what startup was this? why could they not have gone out to market to compete with you instead of letting you whitelabel their product?
- Johnny555 3y agoIt was a pretty low level product near the bottom of our infrastructure tier and we built everything on top of it. It worked well for our specific use case, but apparently not a general enough need to succeed on its own. It's not like we took their product, added a new skin and sold it as our own.
- senderista 3y agoHow many businesses have the in-house expertise to maintain a defunct codebase? And for how many of those that do is it actually an optimal use of resources?
- Rapzid 3y agoThis is a story about successful CYA, not a recommendation to go balls deep on any hawt sAas that comes your way. But also, a lot of companies have engineers that can.. Engineer. Often it's more an availability issue than expertise.
- 3y ago
- senderista 3y agoI don't understand how any tech startup gets any adoption from business users with critical use cases. The risk seems obviously disqualifying.
- acjohnson55 3y agoOne typical strategy is by having all core functionality open source, so that people can self-host, if necessary.