2 ms·
> which usually isn't the case Where do you live? There are many, many places in the US where it is indeed usually the case. (Possibly depending on your defi
by blahedo 3y ago
> which usually isn't the case
Where do you live? There are many, many places in the US where it is indeed usually the case. (Possibly depending on your definition of "far away")
- seba_dos1 3y agoI live in Poland. Wherever the distance to your nearest school is more than 4 kilometers (or 3 kilometers in the early grades), the municipality has to provide transport - which is usually the case only in rural areas. In cities you'll most likely have multiple schools within 1km, which is perfectly walkable even for younger children. The high school I went to was 3.5km away from my home and I was getting there by tram, but if I went to the nearest one it would be 250m away, just like the primary school I went to. Same with kindergarten in fact, but IIRC I wasn't going there on my own back then. I live in suburbs now and the nearest primary school is 700m away - no reason to drive (nor walk) a ~10yo kid to their school here either. (for the record: primary school encompasses what US calls elementary and middle schools here) My very liberal definition of "far away" would probably be something like "more than 1.5km" (the distance I was going by foot to a swimming pool as a kid), more if we consider public transport and bikes too - though those of course won't necessarily be viable options everywhere and at every age.