As the family genealogist, I completely agree. 23andMe had such minimal utility in comparison to the first service where I tested. At most, it corroborated and

As the family genealogist, I completely agree. 23andMe had such minimal utility in comparison to the first service where I tested. At most, it corroborated and confirmed what I already knew and had been told. Also I identified the strongest possible genetic match, a person who hadn't tested elsewhere. But 23andMe's cutesy haplogroup classifications, their faux historical narratives, the ridiculous litany of "health conditions" they warn me about, it's bunk, 100% bunk. Plus, no medical professional will accept this data as diagnostic, so why bother?