3 ms·

You’re seriously comparing the electromagnetic radiation from a starlink satellite to radio and television broadcasts? Like they’re the same power and the same

You’re seriously comparing the electromagnetic radiation from a starlink satellite to radio and television broadcasts? Like they’re the same power and the same frequency? And what if they all affect us, is adding more of them doing us any good? It’s not being able to escape them any good? I’m concerned about this exposure because it affects me in some frequencies affect me more than others. I’ve been affected from this since I was a network engineer at Cisco systems. Which I had to leave, unknowingly to me at the time, because that is when they installed Wi-Fi in the building. So this problem with Starlink is now I have literally nowhere to hide. Even in places that have no access to cell towers someone can drive within 10 miles of me turning their starlink and it’s like putting a tower right next to me.

controversial97 3y ago
The RF power from Starlink satellites that hits the outside of your body when you are outside is very very tiny. It is estimated at 0.000000294 watts per square meter. That amount of energy is much smaller than the 1000 watts per square meter of terahertz radiation, sunlight, that would hit you when stand outside in your swimming trunks on a bright cloudless summers day. If you climb on the roof of a building and stand ten feet from a cellphone base station antenna there might be a few watts per square meter hitting your body. It is not uncommon for a microwave oven to leak a couple of watts. In a typical town the power level from starlink satellites is weaker than TV stations and 88-108MHz FM stations by a factor of at least tens of thousands.
- Podgajski 3y ago
  > It is estimated at 0.000000294 watts per square meter. Please show math or reference. > That amount of energy is much smaller than the 1000 watts per square meter of terahertz radiation, sunlight, that would hit you when stand outside in your swimming trunks on a bright cloudless summers day. Sunlight is not polarized, radiation, millimeter wave radiation from stink is polarized radiation. Big difference. Also, we did not evolve with anthropomorphic millimeter wave radiation yet. We evolved with the sun. Another big difference. > If you climb on the roof of a building and stand ten feet from a cellphone base station antenna there might be a few watts per square meter hitting your body. Do I have to show you the FCC references that say this is dangerous? Even more so with 5G cell towers? https://www.fcc.gov/consumers/guides/human-exposure-radio-frequency-fields-guidelines-cellular-and-pcs-sites https://www.fcc.gov/consumers/guides/human-exposure-radio-fr...
  - controversial97 3y ago
    https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/quick-analysis-starlink-link-budget-potential-emf-david-witkowski https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/quick-analysis-starlink-link-... I don't think that polarization makes any practical difference to how hazardous non-ionizing radiation is. Please show a reference to back up your claim. How do you think polarization makes any difference if a ten-millionth of a watt at 12GHz hits your skin? In the example of standing ten feet from a cellphone base station, I point to IEEE C95.1-2019 which specifies a maximum of 2watts per square meter (below 6GHz) which does not worry me at all. Here is another figure for you: The total power of the cosmic background radiation across 1 to 200GHz or so is 0.000003 watts per square meter At the earths surface, the total power of the cosmic background radiation is higher than the power level of the starlink downlinks! http://bostonastronomy.net/Power.html http://bostonastronomy.net/Power.html
    - Podgajski 3y ago
      You could’ve looked it up yourself, you would learn more if you did. And as I said, before natural radiation is different from anthropological EMF radiation. It’s post and it’s polarized. You can’t compare it to anything natural. While natural unpolarised EMF/EMR at any intensity cannot induce any specific/coherent oscillation on these molecules, polarized man-made EMFs/EMR will induce a coherent forced-oscillation on every charged/polar molecule within biological tissue. This is fundamental to our understanding of the biological phenomena. https://www.nature.com/articles/srep14914#:~:text=While%20natural%20unpolarised%20EMF%2FEMR,understanding%20of%20the%20biological%20phenomena https://www.nature.com/articles/srep14914#:~:text=While%20na.... https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8562392/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8562392/ Thus, in addition to polarization and coherence, the existence of ELFs is a common feature of almost all human-made EMFs. The present study reviews the DNA damage and related effects induced by human-made EMFs. The ion forced-oscillation mechanism for irregular gating of voltage-gated ion channels on cell membranes by polarized/coherent EMFs is extensively described. Dysfunction of ion channels disrupts intracellular ionic concentrations, which determine the cell's electrochemical balance and homeostasis. The present study shows how this can result in DNA damage through reactive oxygen species/free radical overproduction.

controversial97 3y ago

The RF power from Starlink satellites that hits the outside of your body when you are outside is very very tiny. It is estimated at 0.000000294 watts per square meter. That amount of energy is much smaller than the 1000 watts per square meter of terahertz radiation, sunlight, that would hit you when stand outside in your swimming trunks on a bright cloudless summers day. If you climb on the roof of a building and stand ten feet from a cellphone base station antenna there might be a few watts per square meter hitting your body. It is not uncommon for a microwave oven to leak a couple of watts. In a typical town the power level from starlink satellites is weaker than TV stations and 88-108MHz FM stations by a factor of at least tens of thousands.

Podgajski 3y ago
> It is estimated at 0.000000294 watts per square meter. Please show math or reference. > That amount of energy is much smaller than the 1000 watts per square meter of terahertz radiation, sunlight, that would hit you when stand outside in your swimming trunks on a bright cloudless summers day. Sunlight is not polarized, radiation, millimeter wave radiation from stink is polarized radiation. Big difference. Also, we did not evolve with anthropomorphic millimeter wave radiation yet. We evolved with the sun. Another big difference. > If you climb on the roof of a building and stand ten feet from a cellphone base station antenna there might be a few watts per square meter hitting your body. Do I have to show you the FCC references that say this is dangerous? Even more so with 5G cell towers? https://www.fcc.gov/consumers/guides/human-exposure-radio-frequency-fields-guidelines-cellular-and-pcs-sites https://www.fcc.gov/consumers/guides/human-exposure-radio-fr...
- controversial97 3y ago
  https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/quick-analysis-starlink-link-budget-potential-emf-david-witkowski https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/quick-analysis-starlink-link-... I don't think that polarization makes any practical difference to how hazardous non-ionizing radiation is. Please show a reference to back up your claim. How do you think polarization makes any difference if a ten-millionth of a watt at 12GHz hits your skin? In the example of standing ten feet from a cellphone base station, I point to IEEE C95.1-2019 which specifies a maximum of 2watts per square meter (below 6GHz) which does not worry me at all. Here is another figure for you: The total power of the cosmic background radiation across 1 to 200GHz or so is 0.000003 watts per square meter At the earths surface, the total power of the cosmic background radiation is higher than the power level of the starlink downlinks! http://bostonastronomy.net/Power.html http://bostonastronomy.net/Power.html
  - Podgajski 3y ago
    You could’ve looked it up yourself, you would learn more if you did. And as I said, before natural radiation is different from anthropological EMF radiation. It’s post and it’s polarized. You can’t compare it to anything natural. While natural unpolarised EMF/EMR at any intensity cannot induce any specific/coherent oscillation on these molecules, polarized man-made EMFs/EMR will induce a coherent forced-oscillation on every charged/polar molecule within biological tissue. This is fundamental to our understanding of the biological phenomena. https://www.nature.com/articles/srep14914#:~:text=While%20natural%20unpolarised%20EMF%2FEMR,understanding%20of%20the%20biological%20phenomena https://www.nature.com/articles/srep14914#:~:text=While%20na.... https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8562392/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8562392/ Thus, in addition to polarization and coherence, the existence of ELFs is a common feature of almost all human-made EMFs. The present study reviews the DNA damage and related effects induced by human-made EMFs. The ion forced-oscillation mechanism for irregular gating of voltage-gated ion channels on cell membranes by polarized/coherent EMFs is extensively described. Dysfunction of ion channels disrupts intracellular ionic concentrations, which determine the cell's electrochemical balance and homeostasis. The present study shows how this can result in DNA damage through reactive oxygen species/free radical overproduction.