4 ms·
It would be much easier to take out the current mobile carriers than a Starlink sat. The code that runs it is of terrible quality, maintained by incompetent com
by Nextgrid 3y ago
It would be much easier to take out the current mobile carriers than a Starlink sat. The code that runs it is of terrible quality, maintained by incompetent companies with no incentive to deliver a quality service due to their oligopoly and the regulator being asleep at the wheel.
The reason nobody is doing it now is because it's a one-shot weapon. You fire it once and your target will wake up and actually do better (rather, the government will force them to on national security grounds).
However, non-disruptive attacks on mobile carriers are common. I'd wager any competent intelligence agency has a full view of worldwide SMS comms for example. Similarly, non-government bad actors also have insider access via malware or bribery.
- jltsiren 3y agoThere is a convenient sanity check these days: just look what is happening in Ukraine. One of the major lessons of the war has been that modern infrastructure is resilient.
- hedora 3y agoAnother major lesson is that the ultra-wealthy can aid the enemy during US-funded military operations with no apparent consequences.
- inemesitaffia 3y agoTell the Feds to pay their bills