2 ms·
Mostly because good transit implementation is so expensive only like a half dozen cities in the US are financially capable of building new rail transit or hirin
by kjkjadksj 3y ago
Mostly because good transit implementation is so expensive only like a half dozen cities in the US are financially capable of building new rail transit or hiring a lot more bus operators. Also the fact bike lane projects in this country are seemingly done like a half mile at a time to the lowest standards, rather than a one shot whole network wide rollout of lanes that would make suburbanites feel safe to bike to errands. A robust bike network seems difficult only if you forget its just a matter of how you put paint on a road thats probably already regularly budgeted in routine road surfacing work, over having to spend real money and actually expand budgets. This all goes to show how timid politicians have become in recent years towards stepping off into the unknown and actually diverging from the status quo.
- QuercusMax 3y agoCompared to adding more lanes for cars, buying/leasing buses and hiring drivers has gotta be way cheaper. Road construction is expensive, especially if you have to get additional space in the right-of-way.
- bombcar 3y agoDo the math and run the numbers; the roads are usually much cheaper because once built the maintenance is relatively pedestrian. Whereas the cost of a bus line usually has as a yearly maintenance/labor a significant portion.