2 ms·
Ok but it assumes the domain is compromised as stated in the article, and if the domain controller is compromised, it’s a game over for connected machines hence
by tamimio 3y ago
Ok but it assumes the domain is compromised as stated in the article, and if the domain controller is compromised, it’s a game over for connected machines hence these attacks usually focus on domain admin or schema admin.
Edit: it seems the second non-biometric method doesn’t need domain, it’s still however need that local access
> S-1-5-21-505269936…
Kind of off topic but around 20years ago when I had my first portable harddisk, I used this method by creating these type of folders and remembering the numbers sequence in a creative way to hide my files when traveling/crossing borders while putting some decoy files in the plain sight, before knowing/using data encryptions, and it worked, I remember the agent taking my hdd and seeing him going through the decoy files and then returning my hdd normally.
- alberth 3y agoAgreed. > "We recently conducted a penetration test with the goal of compromising the internal network of a client in a Windows environment. As usual, we managed to get administrative access to the domain controller" This article feels like click-bait, when they buried the lede.