4 ms·
The reality is that it would be very hard to find Python code that does not use NumPy (or some tensor lib), for matmul. Including time to JIT compile is questi
by montebicyclelo 3y ago
The reality is that it would be very hard to find Python code that does not use NumPy (or some tensor lib), for matmul.
Including time to JIT compile is questionable, why not also include time to compile the compiled languages?
- igouy 3y ago"Nonetheless, because most benchmarks run for several seconds, including the startup time does not greatly affect the results." https://github.com/attractivechaos/plb2#startup-time https://github.com/attractivechaos/plb2#startup-time
- montebicyclelo 3y agoYes, I saw that and still consider the methodology questionable. A fairer approach might be: time from the cli, including compilation, for compiled languages. (Or warmup the jit compiled code.)
- igouy 3y agoThose are unfounded conjectures. When you show the results for those programs have been greatly affected … As-in "Wtf kind of benchmark counts the jvm startup time?" https://benchmarksgame-team.pages.debian.net/benchmarksgame/sometimes-people-just-make-up-stuff.html#jvm-startup-time https://benchmarksgame-team.pages.debian.net/benchmarksgame/...