> I find that style of language off-putting and immature. I normally do too but somehow it didn’t rub me the wrong way in this instance. Perhaps the 1980s sty

> I find that style of language off-putting and immature. I normally do too but somehow it didn’t rub me the wrong way in this instance. Perhaps the 1980s style day-glo star disarmed me? I didn’t really like that esthetic back when it was in fashion, but for some reason it was disarming here. Perhaps it was the fact that the page was mainly a simple explanation with some clear drawings so a little stylistic exuberance didn’t overclutter things in my head. All that been said, I’d normally be the same kind of curmudgeon as you.