2 ms·
The root of the issue actually appears to be that OpenBSD still supports extremely old and slow architectures (that struggle to build itself): alpha amd64
by alberth 3y ago
The root of the issue actually appears to be that OpenBSD still supports extremely old and slow architectures (that struggle to build itself):
alpha
amd64
arm64
armv7
hppa
i386
landisk
loongson
luna88k
macppc
octeon
powerpc64
riscv64
sparc64
For a project with such limited resources as OpenBSD, it seems wise for them to drop support for a large number of these legacy platforms and focus on more widely used architectures.
I understand that, supporting more architectures actually help uncover more bugs. But you could still do that with a supported platform list that is 1/2 that size.
https://www.openbsd.org/plat.html https://www.openbsd.org/plat.html
Look at what DragonflyBSD has been able to accomplish, truly competitive with Linux regarding performance and features, with the smallest development team out of all the BSDs.
They can do this in large part because they focus on only 1 platform (supporting arch64).
- StayTrue 3y agoBut it isn’t a business that can shuffle human resources at will. Your point reminds me of Theo losing his shit about how long it took me to build the CD release images I was responsible for. Poor machine crunched for more than a week to do it.
- SoftTalker 3y agoOver the years they have dropped support for a number of platforms[1], but they don't do it based on "popularity" but more whether there are developers (with hardware available) who are interested in working on it. [1] https://www.openbsd.org/plat.html https://www.openbsd.org/plat.html