3 ms·
> The actual papers themselves seem pretty solid from a surface reading as a non-expert, at least in terms of having clear explanations and easily verifiable re
by falsandtru 3y ago
> The actual papers themselves seem pretty solid from a surface reading as a non-expert, at least in terms of having clear explanations and easily verifiable results.
If you only read one paper in an unfamiliar field, you will not know if it lacks the necessary analysis.
- vanderZwan 3y agoThis isn't exactly a paper on room temperature superconductors... I read plenty of compsci papers and whitepapers, I just don't have to work with this specific niche of web caching. I doubt the methodology for benchmarking is so radically different from other computer backgrounds that my ability to detect fudging in it, or other structural issues with them would be compromised. And on top of that, in this case both the code and data sets are available and the papers went through peer review.
- falsandtru 3y ago> This isn't exactly a paper on room temperature superconductors... Same in every field. > I read plenty of compsci papers and whitepapers, I just don't have to work with this specific niche of web caching. You clearly have no expertise in this field. Over.
- vanderZwan 3y agoAh, you didn't come here to have a discussion, but to "win" a "debate". Sure, whatever, you win