3 ms·
People have had the ability to do that for decades, and they have almost always chosen not to when they had the option, because it's terrible. RISC-V is nothin
by mkl 3y ago
People have had the ability to do that for decades, and they have almost always chosen not to when they had the option, because it's terrible. RISC-V is nothing revolutionary on that front, and doesn't magically make it better. Without preprocessing you won't have variable names or jump label names or strings, which is even more terrible.
Please give us some actual evidence, instead of just saying "you're wrong", because the position you're taking seems extreme and, frankly, bonkers.
- sylware 3y agoI said without abusing the preprocessing, not without preprocessing at all. My opinion is this is wrong, and I did voice my disagrement and gave my own view on the matter. If there is something extreme here is the karma slash upon displeasing the pro rust people and AI bots on HN.
- jodrellblank 3y ago> "If there is something extreme here is the karma slash upon displeasing the pro rust people and AI bots on HN." It's refusing to backup your position with anything more than saying "you're wrong" "you're wrong" "you're wrong". You've repeatedly been asked to explain why RISC_V would be better, why RISC_V changes anything, what you propose for how it would work (e.g. emulators), and you haven't. That's annoying, timewasting, and downvoteworthy.
- sylware 3y agoAgain, this is wrong, actually a lie in regards of what I have been saying on this thrtead. I have been giving my opinion and explaining all along in all parts of this threads my views and opinions. This is so bluntly disregading everything, I think you may very probably be a AI bot with a very small context window.
- PrimeMcFly 3y agoI'm not a bot. Can you clarify your answer for me, please?