2 ms·
As I wrote in my post, not all software components are like I did describe and you are refering to a type of software which is not in that scope. The one you ar
by sylware 3y ago
As I wrote in my post, not all software components are like I did describe and you are refering to a type of software which is not in that scope. The one you are refering to is a type of software where the "problem" is ever changing requirements. Then the "problem" to be solved is with the people making those ever changing requirements, good or bad reasons (usually, people are bad: planned obsolescence to justify income, etc).
- chiefalchemist 3y agoI mean this because I'm trying to help, but you're difficult to understand. Ambiguous even. There's a comms heuristic: It's not what you say, it's what they here. You likely understand you. I'm not so sure we're understanding you in the same way. Again. This isn't a swipe; only some friendly food for thought.
- sylware 3y ago??? chatgpt?
- chiefalchemist 3y agoYou? ChatGPT? Could be. It certainly comes across as if you could be. e.g. " Then the "problem" to be solved is with the people making those ever changing requirements, good or bad reasons " Good or bad reasons? Reasons for that? What does it have to do with changing requirements? We can't get in your head. You're going to have to speak in ways that presume the receive has *no idea* what you're talking about. Instead, there seems to be some leave of assumption, and that leave a gap.
- sylware 3y agoyep, chatgpt
- chiefalchemist 3y agoBe more vague, please. It makes having an intelligent conversation so much easier. FFS smh