3 ms·
This is an ideological view that I would oppose. GPL is beneficial for the user compared to MIT because any improvements made by users of a project will be open
by master-lincoln 3y ago
This is an ideological view that I would oppose.
GPL is beneficial for the user compared to MIT because any improvements made by users of a project will be open for everybody again.
With MIT it's just easier to make a profit without giving back. That is not in the interest of consumers
- ilikehurdles 3y agoIt sounds like we agree? With the GPL all users have the right to look at the code. With MIT none do. This seems like a pretty straightforward consumer benefit that anyone should be able to acknowledge regardless of which license they develop with.
- cmrdporcupine 3y agoyeah seems like they read your comment wrong
- master-lincoln 3y agoindeed, sorry, not sure why I got this wrong